打線拉力測試失敗 / 通過 / 下降。Pull strength 是打線品質的關鍵驗收項目。
錫球剪切強度失敗 / 通過。Ball shear 是 BGA 跟 flip chip 的關鍵 reliability 驗收。
空洞被找到 / 在規格內 / 超標 / 緩解。Void 在 die attach 或 underfill 都是 reliability 風險。
封裝塑料剝離 / 裂開 / 變色。Mold delamination 是封裝 reliability 紅燈。
Die 龜裂 / 缺角。常發生在 dicing 或 die attach 階段。
錫球缺失 / 氧化 / 共平面。Missing ball 是 BGA 致命缺陷。
封裝共平面度在 / 超出 spec / 失敗。BGA 共平面性是 SMT 上板的關鍵。
Wafer 出貨 / 交接 / 抵達 OSAT。Wafer fab 跟封測廠的介面。
wire bond failure report
Wire bond failure on scope: failure_mode at N% rate; root cause: cause.
{範圍} 的打線失敗:{失效模式} 比例 {N}%;根因:{cause}。打線異常標準報告句。
JEDEC qual report
Package package_type JEDEC level level qualification: result; failure_count failures observed.
{封裝類型} JEDEC 等級 {等級} 認證:{結果};觀察到 {failure_count} 個失效。
X-ray void inspection
X-ray inspection on scope: void_pct% voids; action per spec spec.
{範圍} 的 X-ray 檢查:{void_pct}% 空洞;依規格 {spec} {動作}。
reliability flag · assembly
Reliability concern on package due to issue; recommend action pending test.
{封裝} 因 {問題} 出現 reliability 疑慮;建議 {動作},等待 {測試}。
OSAT status update
Per OSAT update: lot_id status is status; expected next_step on date.
依 OSAT 更新:{批號} 狀態為 {狀態};預期 {下一步} 於 {日期}。
Email — Wire Bond Pull Failure
Assembly OSAT 工程師發給 wafer fab 跟 PIE,wire bond 拉力測試失敗。
Subject: [HOLD] Wire bond pull failure on lot Q3-218 — pad oxidation suspect Hi all, Heads up — Wire bond pull strength on lot Q3-218 failed acceptance criteria during in-line monitoring at our OSAT site. Symptom: - Pull strength on 12 wires from a sampling of 100 units measured 4.5–6.0 grams. - Acceptance spec is >7 grams. - Failure mode: cratering (pull at pad-to-die interface). Initial investigation: - Wafers from this lot were stored at OSAT for 4 months before assembly. - Wafer-side AlSi pad surface inspection shows visible oxidation under SEM. - Storage humidity log shows two excursions above 60% RH during the storage window. Containment: - Lot Q3-218 held at WB step. - Remaining wafers from same lot pulled for pad surface inspection. - All units already wire-bonded (60 units) pending pull test on every wire. Request: - Wafer fab side: confirm pad metallization spec — was AlSi or AlSiCu used? AlSi without Cu is more oxidation-prone. - Storage SOP at OSAT: review humidity control on the affected storage cabinet. Will share update by tomorrow EOD. Thanks, OSAT Assembly
相關縮寫:WB · OSAT · SEM · SOP
Conf Call — JEDEC Qualification Update
Package qual review,封裝部門 lead 報告 Product X BGA 的 JEDEC 認證結果。
Thanks. Quick update on Product X BGA-484 JEDEC qualification. Current status: 80% complete. Three sub-tests done, two pending. Done: - MSL Level 3 (Moisture Sensitivity): passed. 100 units, 0 failures after 168h conditioning + 3x reflow. - TC Pre-conditioning (260°C reflow): passed. - UHAST 96h: passed. 0 electrical failures, 0 visible delamination. Pending: - TC 1000 cycles: 60% complete (600 cycles). Initial results clean — 0 failures so far. Target completion next Friday. - HTOL 1000h: 30% complete (300 hours). 0 failures so far. Target completion in 3 weeks. Risks: - TC trending fine but one unit showing a marginal underfill void increase. We're watching closely; if void grows we may have a failure mode in the last 400 cycles. - HTOL: too early to call, but no anomalies in the first 300 hours. Customer ship date: assuming all tests close clean by mid-April, ship on plan. PQA team is on the email distribution; let me know if anyone wants to deep-dive on a sub-test. Open to questions.
相關縮寫:BGA · MSL · TC · UHAST · HTOL · PQA
Deviation Report — Mold Delamination
JEDEC 試驗中 mold delamination 失效的 deviation report Section 4。
4.0 Root Cause Analysis — Mold Delamination on BGA-484 4.1 Symptom During the BGA-484 JEDEC Level 3 qualification, 3 of 100 units showed mold delamination at the package corners after the 3rd reflow cycle. C-SAM (Acoustic Scanning) imaging confirms delamination extending 1.5–2.5 mm from each corner. 4.2 Investigation Path - Cross-section on a failing unit shows clean interface between mold and substrate solder mask, no contamination. - Mold lot traceability: all 3 failing units used mold compound batch #2026-114. - Compound batch #2026-114 inspection: moisture absorption pre-cure recorded at 0.4%, vs spec <0.3%. Storage area dehumidifier alarm log shows a 6-hour humidity excursion on 02/28. - Other batches of the same mold compound: 0 delamination in 200 units tested. 4.3 Root Cause Statement The mold delamination is attributed to elevated moisture absorption in mold compound batch #2026-114 due to a 6-hour humidity excursion during pre-cure storage, leading to vapor pressure expansion during MSL reflow cycles. Confirmed by C-SAM imaging, batch traceability, and storage log review. 4.4 Containment - Mold compound batch #2026-114 quarantined; remaining 80 kg removed from production floor. - All BGA packages produced from this batch (240 units) re-tested with C-SAM; 12 additional delamination defects found, all scrapped. - Storage area dehumidifier alarm threshold tightened from 50% RH to 45% RH. 4.5 Long-Term Action - Pre-cure moisture content check added to incoming mold compound QC, every batch. - Storage humidity logged continuously, with auto-quarantine if any 1-hour reading exceeds 50% RH. - FMEA updated to include "mold compound moisture excursion → reflow delamination" as a high-severity failure mode.
相關縮寫:BGA · MSL · C-SAM · QC · FMEA
讀完了?來測驗看看記住了沒。
開始測驗 → (13 題)